Writing Paper Synonyms, Writing Paper Antonyms
The Elements of Style, William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White, is basic e-book on improving your writing.
You don't wish to make glaringly obvious that you spent rather more time and house on one reviewer than one other. After you submit a paper, do not cease working on it! For occasion, you may increase the experiments, improve the implementation, or make other changes. Even if your paper is accepted, you want the accepted model to be as impressive as attainable.
You should not submit your paper too late, as a result of then the community is disadvantaged of your scientific insights. In general, you need to err on the side of submitting too late somewhat than too early. It often best to not e mail the doc, however to provide a location from which reviewers can acquire the most recent model of the paper, corresponding to a model control repository or a URL you will update. That method, you will not clutter inboxes with many revisions, and readers can all the time get the newest copy.
Be thoughtful to your reviewers, who're spending their time that can assist you. When readers misunderstand the paper, that is always a minimum of partly the creator's fault! Even when you suppose the readers have missed the point, you'll learn how your work can be misinterpreted, and eliminating these ambiguities will improve the paper. Unless your strategy is a small variation on another method, it's normally finest to defer the associated work to the top of the paper.
When it comes first, it gives readers the impression that your work is rather by-product. If you document and automate these steps, then you possibly can simply regenerate the paper when needed.
Do not confuse relative and absolute measurements. For occasion, suppose your medication cures 30% of sufferers, and the placebo cures 25% of patients. You may report that your drugs's remedy rate is .3, the placebo's treatment rate is .25, and your medication's treatment price is either .05 larger or 20% higher.
Don't be afraid to suppose earlier than you write, and even jot down notes, diagrams, and so on. Even small flaws or omissions in an otherwise good paper could lead to rejection. This is especially at the elite venues with small acceptance charges, the place you should goal your work. Referees are generally people of excellent will, however completely different referees at a conference may have completely different requirements, so the luck of the draw in referees is a consider acceptance. They have spent appreciable time and vitality to provide you suggestions (even when it would not appear to you that they've!), and you ought to be grateful and courteous in return.
And if the paper is rejected, you have to have a better paper to undergo the next venue. It's true that the feedback from reviewers is extraordinarily valuable to you and will allow you to improve the paper. However, you should get suggestions from other scientists earlier than submitting for publication. You will waste the time of exhausting-working reviewers, who will provide you with suggestions that you could have obtained in different methods.
This is useful if you re-run experiments or analysis, or if you have to defend your outcomes against a criticism by different researchers. If you leave some steps handbook, then you or your colleagues are highly likely to make a mistake or to be unable to reproduce your outcomes later. Your paper probably consists of tables, bibliographies, or other content material that's generated from external information. Your paper may be written in a textual content formatting language such as LaTeX. In each of those cases, it is essential to run some external command to create a number of the content material or to create the final PDF.
A rule of thumb is to submit only in case you are proud for the world to affiliate your name with the work, in its present kind. If you understand of significant criticisms that reviewers may increase, then don't submit the paper. You should not submit your paper too early, when it doesn't reflect properly on you and a submission would waste the neighborhood's reviewing resources.
Just as you should correctly use “120% extra” versus “a hundred and twenty% as many”, you should accurately use “three instances faster than” versus “three instances as quick as”. A related, also frequent, confusion is between “3 times sooner than and 3 occasions as fast as”.